Part 2
Fast-forward to mid-August, and yet another of the weekly High Risk Clinic OB-GYN appointments with the County doctors and nurses to monitor her pregnancy, and they say 'we got Dr Steinberg's letter, and we will write you a prescription you can fill downstairs for the aspirin regimen.'
Huh?!
She requests and gets a copy of his letter and the prescription immediately, and discovers the following inaccurate statements made in it:
-Dr Steinberg did an extensive and thorough exam of her MM status.
-She is being seen regularly by his clinic.
-She suffers from regular severe headaches and takes Advil often.
-She has been on an aspirin regimen continuously.
-He has scheduled, and she has agreed to, an Angio the first week of November(!).
In the rest of the letter Dr Steinberg basically tells them that she is just fine, and that he wants her taking a baby aspirin once a day starting immediately!
OK, it seems wrong to me to prescribe a blood thinner to a woman only a month and a half from labor and blood loss, and my daughter feels the same way- but remember, these doctors know NOTHING about MM and are relying completely on Dr Steinberg for guidance here.
Laura DEMANDS that I immediately drive her to Stanford to retrieve her scans from them per the promise, and I do so.
But, NO, they refuse to even look for them, insist she needed to make an appointment, ask the nurses first, and get Dr Steinberg's sign-off before she can have them!
What!?
Listening to either logic or their own promises made is not on the agenda, and finally they VERY reluctantly call down to the nurses and one of them comes up to talk to Laura.
She tries very hard to tell her that no, they aren't saying the scans are lost, just that they have no idea where they are in the myriad locales and will have to hunt for them and call us back when they find them.
Recognizing that no way are we getting the scans today, I give her my cell and she agrees to call when they are hunted down.
Yes, they turned up two day's later, and we fetched them back.
The one bright spot in all this?
There is a CC at the end of Dr Steinberg's letter to VMC- to, of all people, Dr Micheal Edwards, Laura's surgeon at UCSF back in 1990!
We puzzle through the abbreviation after his name, and decide MAYBE it stands for Medical Clinic of Stanford University, and ask at the desk in the lobby if they have him listed- YES!
We hike the 400 miles to the far end of the new wing of the Children's Hospital, only to find out he is only in on Thursdays, and has JUST come on staff.
Laura and I stop in and see him later that week, and he concurs that Laura should NOT be taking the aspirin until after post-delivery recovery, and says a regular angio is insane and WAY too high risk, but that a newer scan that incorporates the features of an angio a CT and an MRI but is totally non-intrusive is the current tool, and he would love to see her and do the test and discuss the results with her afterwards.
Yay!

He says she is way to far along now for the radiologists to be OK with doing a scan until after the baby, so we are stuck.
Oh well, at least we have a reason...
He says that Dr Steinberg had stopped him in the halls and told him about Laura's visit and expressed astonishment that she was so healthy appearing and had had no problems so far-
seems they have a still-running difference of opinion as to which is better: Direct or Indirect Bypass.
Dr Edwards is taking over juvenile surgeries at Stanford, and Steinberg is keeping the adult surgeries- but Edwards is seeing his juvenile patients for follow-ups even after they reach adulthood in his mini-clinic in the new Cancer wing.
So....
Just the facts, all the facts, and let the chips land where they may folks...
S